Thursday, February 6, 2025
HomeModern"Give me a group of bricklayers over a 3D printer each time"...

“Give me a group of bricklayers over a 3D printer each time” says commenter

“Give me a group of bricklayers over a 3D printer each time” says commenter

best barefoot shoes

On this week’s feedback replace, readers are discussing the primary 3D-printed home to be accomplished at  the “largest-scale growth of 3D-printed houses on the planet”.

Co-designed by Danish structure studio BIG and American 3D-printing agency ICON, the full-sized mannequin house is one in every of 100 homes which can be presently being constructed by native agency Lennar.

The home, which can function a mannequin for potential patrons, has striated 3D-printed partitions constructed by the usage of ICON’s proprietary materials, Lavacrete.

Presently projected to price between $475,990-$559,990, Dezeen commenters have been left questioning whether or not 3D-printed houses are price it.

BIG and ICON complete first 3D-printed house in Texas neighbourhood
BIG and ICON full first 3D-printed home in Texas neighbourhood

“Why complicate such a comparatively minor price aspect with such a contrived concept?”

“[I] discover the idea of the 3D-printed home very fascinating, however for now it has too many limitations,” wrote JBH3.

“My assumption is that the designs will get higher because the expertise will get higher,” they continued. “If they will get the price down, I believe this could be a expertise that may very well be used for low-income housing. Proper now all I see is the mud build up on each line within the wall.”

Franky 4 fingers was on the identical web page: “Fascinating idea however at this worth level, that is unaffordable for first-time residence patrons. So whereas it’d tackle some sustainability points (time will inform), it isn’t precisely addressing a necessity for houses that a median revenue can afford.”

Whereas some commenters questioned BIG’s position within the design of the mannequin home – “Why did they want BIG to attract a three-bed flooring plan when ICON has a listing stuffed with 3D-printed bungalows?” questioned Marius.

Colin MacGillivray was equally cynical, asking “what share of the ultimate price of a home in Texas do the exterior partitions price? 10-15 per cent? Why complicate such a comparatively minor price aspect which is so necessary to the ultimate look with such a contrived concept?”

“Give me a group of carpenters or bricklayers each time over a 3D concrete printer,” concluded AlfredHitchcock. “Simply because one thing is feasible would not make it a good suggestion.”

Is 3D printing the way forward for building or an all-out flop? Be a part of the dialogue ›

M&S Oxford Street store
Marks & Spencer’s Oxford Road flagship saved from demolition in “large victory for heritage”

“There are such a lot of ugly buildings on Oxford Road – do not demolish one of many good ones”

Additionally igniting debate within the feedback part this week was the information that British Secretary of State Michael Gove has rejected Marks & Spencer’s plans to demolish its Artwork Deco flagship retailer on Oxford Road in London.

Some commenters welcomed the choice, whereas others thought “we may do higher”.

“That is immensely necessary information,” wrote Chris. “A constructing that ought to have by no means even been thought-about for wholesale demolition.” Whereas Freddie Lewis reasoned “there are such a lot of horrendously ugly buildings on Oxford Road – do not demolish one of many good ones”.

Whateverandeveramen took Apsco Radiales to process for his view that the rejection is “one of many higher choices the GB authorities has made in years”, responding “why? Even Historic England would not need to checklist this constructing. There are such a lot of higher examples of this architectural model. We needn’t pickle the entire of the Twenties.”

AlfredHitchcock, in the meantime, was caught between a rock and a tough place. “It is an unpleasant constructing with little or no architectural benefit and doubtless very tough to adapt for reuse because of its strengthened concrete construction. Nevertheless, the proposed alternative constructing would even have had zero architectural benefit.”

JB took a extra blunt view. “The brand new design sucks, so it is higher to maintain this one,” they mentioned.

Are you in favour of Gove’s choice? Be a part of the dialogue ›

Oxagon port at Neom
Saudi Arabia in search of mortgage of $2.7 billion to fund Neom

“Let him pay for it”

Information that Saudi Arabia is reportedly seeking to elevate a mortgage of 10 billion riyals to develop its controversial Neom area brought on a small storm within the feedback part this week, with many readers questioning why crown prince Mohammed bin Salman would not simply foot the invoice himself.

“Wait,” wrote Milos Mother. “The little prince is price $18 billion. Let him pay for it.

This sentiment was echoed by Ralph Kent, who referred to as the Saudi authorities’s method to borrowing and lending a “questionable monetary merry-go-round”.

“The price of growing Hudson Yards was round $25 billion,” posited Volantt in reference to the 28-acre growth in Manhattan. “To develop such a metropolis [as The Line] it is advisable to spend 100 instances extra at the very least. It seems extra like a gold mine for consultants, reasonably than an actual undertaking.”

However Apsco Radiales did not see a lot hope for the mortgage coming by, questioning “what lending establishment will give them the cash and take part within the largest folly in a whole lot of years”.

Do you suppose the Neom growth is a billionaire’s folly? Be a part of the dialogue ›

Feedback replace

Dezeen is the world’s most commented structure and design journal, receiving hundreds of feedback every month from readers. Preserve updated on the newest discussions on our feedback web page and subscribe to our weekly Debate e-newsletter, the place we characteristic the most effective reader feedback from tales within the final seven days.

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments

java burn weight loss with coffee

This will close in 12 seconds