On this week’s feedback replace, readers are discussing a home within the Hamptons by Diller Scofidio + Renfro with a sloping fibreglass roof and a glass facade.
The house, which was not too long ago photographed by Iwan Baan, was accomplished in 2017 for Museum of Up to date Artwork Detroit founder Julie Taubman and her husband, Robert Taubman.
“A really gorgeous creation”
Commenters had been overwhelmed by the dimensions and design of the undertaking.
“The home is a really gorgeous creation,” wrote Stace A. “But it surely’s additionally the type of factor that does not welcome use and merely touching something threatens its pristine-ness”.
Walter Astor additionally had considerations concerning the longevity of the design. “I’m wondering if it can age properly? Usually these ‘sculptural’ homes don’t stand the take a look at of time.”
Grinch favored the design however issued a phrase of warning, writing “implausible design, however each undertaking like that is emblematic of the truth that the world goes to hell in a handcart”.
“Let’s save this kind of great exuberance for public tasks that we are able to all take pleasure in, not only a few over-privileged individuals,” they added.
Fdvz discovered the undertaking to be an “over-the-top design with zero consideration for the setting”.
Aigoual was damning of their evaluation: “as if this extravagant, pompous, narcissistic, multimillion-dollar design is in concord with its environment! That is simply one other instance of what Japanese Lengthy Island has turn into: a showcase haven for the one per cent who do not know what to do with their $$$.”
What do you consider this uncommon home? Be a part of the dialogue ›
“Very long time coming and comfortable to see it lastly arrive”
Commenters had been extra constructive a couple of translucent-marble-clad field at New York’s World Commerce Heart website. Positioned alongside One World Commerce Heart in downtown Manhattan, the Perelman Performing Arts Heart by structure studio Rex includes a cubic construction with skinny marble cladding.
Alex Kustow mentioned they had been “so excited by this and impressed with the great results of such an distinctive collection of challenges. I dwell in New York and may’t wait to go to.”
DWG was in the identical boat saying: “I like the look of this. The doorway appears to be like gorgeous!”
“I work round there within the daytime,” commented Cordcutter. “It appears to be like bland, however I have been leaving work round nightfall and at nighttime it appears to be like lovely. Very long time coming and comfortable to see it lastly arrive.”
A number of readers celebrated the studio’s selection of supplies. “I used to be uncertain once I noticed the renderings and glad I used to be fallacious,” wrote Kem Roolhaas. “Blissful to lastly see a constructing with marble backlit like that on the facade.”
One of many few commenters unconvinced was JB, who wrote “certainly respect for the memorial may have been achieved with out making a mausoleum? This can be a joyless and certainly mournful edifice completely at odds with its contents.”
Joyless or lovely? Be a part of the dialogue ›
“Individuals are going to die as a result of somebody desires to construct an indoor mall within the desert”
Additionally on commenters’ radars this week was an opinion piece by Dana Cuff in response to the latest documentary about The Line mega-project in Saudi Arabia.
Commenter’s responded to Cuff’s evaluation that the documentary is likely to be “structure’s kiss of loss of life”.
Kasimir reckoned that “Neom will make it into the historical past books because the loss of life of Twentieth-century structure,” however they argued that “it does not imply structure is dying, however structure is remodeling into one thing new”.
Different readers echoed Cuff’s considerations: “the ladies’s voices are heard for just below two and a half minutes of the whole video,” posited Tiger Lou. “This means the kind of society one ought to count on from such a megalomaniacal undertaking!”
On the opposite aspect of the controversy Rob Rohena wrote “imagine it or not, architects have little or no leverage of their purchasers’ ethics”.
Zea Newland tried to place issues again into perspective, writing “individuals are going to die as a result of somebody desires to construct an indoor mall within the desert in any respect prices”.
“Having a spine was once thought-about a power. Now, it is seen as weak and annoying. Why?” they requested.
What do you make of Dana Cuff’s argument? Be a part of the dialogue ›
Feedback replace
Dezeen is the world’s most commented structure and design journal, receiving 1000’s of feedback every month from readers. Maintain updated on the newest discussions on our feedback web page and subscribe to our weekly Debate publication, the place we function the perfect reader feedback from tales within the final seven days.
